Xiaomi Mi 10T vs. BenQ F3
Specifications Highlights |
---|
product_name_Üstr | Mi 10T | F3 |
aggregated_product | Xiaomi Mi 10T (Launched 2020-09-30), Price: 430 USD at Amazon | BenQ F3 (Launched 2013-11-01) |
aggregated_display | 6.67" 2400x1080 IPS LCD | 4.5" 960x540 IPS LCD |
aggregated_cam_rear_all | - 26mm 64-MP f/1.89 (Primary)
- 12mm 13-MP f/2.4
- 5-MP f/2.4
| |
aggregated_cam_front_all | | |
aggregated_computing | - Snapdragon 865 SoC
- 6GB/8GB RAM
- 128GB Storage
| - MT6589 SoC
- 1GB RAM
- 4GB Storage
- MicroSD (32GB max.)
|
aggregated_battery | 5000 mAh, Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ | 2100 mAh |
aggregated_design | IP Rating, 216g (7.6oz), 76.4x165.1x9.33 mm (3.01 x 6.50 x 0.37 inches) | IP Rating, 119g (4.2oz), 131.6x66.9x8.9 mm (5.18 x 2.63 x 0.35 inches) |
product_price_street_Üusd_Ünum | $430 | |
product_price_release_Üusd_Ünum | $499 | |
Display |
---|
product_name_Üstr | Mi 10T | F3 |
display_type_Üss | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
display_refresh_Ühz_Ünum | 30 | |
display_diagonal_Üinch_Ünum | 6.67" | 4.5" |
display_body_ratio_Üpct_Ünum | 85.2% | 63.4% |
display_resolution_Üpix_Üstr | 2400x1080 | 960x540 |
display_density_Üppi_Ünum | 395 PPI | 245 PPI |
display_specs_brightness_Ünits_Ünum | 650 NITs | |
display_glass_name_Üss | Gorilla Glass 5 | |
display_features_Üas | | |
display_color_Übits_Ünum | 24 bit (16,777,216 colors) | 24 bit (16,777,216 colors) |
Primary Camera |
---|
product_name_Üstr | Mi 10T | F3 |
megapixel_Ümpix_Ünum | 64-MP | 13-MP |
aperture_Üfstop_Ünum | f/1.89 | |
focal_lenght35_Ümm_Ünum | 26mm | |
dyn_sensor_surface_descrption_Üstr | Large | Small |
cam_hardware_features_Üas | | |
Ultrawide Camera |
---|
product_name_Üstr | Mi 10T | |
megapixel_Ümpix_Ünum | 13-MP | |
aperture_Üfstop_Ünum | f/2.4 | |
focal_lenght35_Ümm_Ünum | 12mm | |
dyn_sensor_surface_descrption_Üstr | Small | |
Macro Camera |
---|
product_name_Üstr | Mi 10T | |
megapixel_Ümpix_Ünum | 5-MP | |
aperture_Üfstop_Ünum | f/2.4 | |
dyn_sensor_surface_descrption_Üstr | Very small | |
autofocus_features_Üas | | |
cam_hardware_features_Üas | | |
Battery |
---|
product_name_Üstr | Mi 10T | F3 |
battery_type_Üss | Li-Poly | Li-Ion |
battery_capacity_Ümah_Ünum | 5000 mAh | 2100 mAh |
battery_features_Üas | | |
battery_fastcharge_protocol_Üstr | Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ | |
Computing |
---|
product_name_Üstr | Mi 10T | F3 |
main_processor_brand_name_Üstr | Qualcomm | Mediatek |
main_processor_name_Üstr | Snapdragon 865 | MT6589 |
main_processor_core_number_Ünum | 8 | 4 |
main_processor_ÜGhz_Üstr | 2.84 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
memory_ram_ÜgB_Üanum | 6GB/8GB | 1GB |
memory_built_in_storage_ÜgB_Üanum | 128GB | 4GB |
memory_card_type_Üss | | MicroSD |
memory_card_max_capacity_ÜgB_Ünum | | 32GB |
operating_system_compound_Üstr | Android 10 | Android 4.2.2 |
Communications |
---|
product_name_Üstr | Mi 10T | F3 |
lte_cat_down_Üstr | LTE CAT20 2.0 Gbps/316 Mbps | |
lte_bands_list_Üstr | 1, 2, 20, 28, 3, 32, 38, 4, 40, 41, 5, 7, 8 | |
modem_features_Üas | - UMTS
- EDGE
- GPRS
- HSPA+
- LTE
- 5G NSA
- 5G SA
| |
wifi_speeds_Üas | | |
wifi_features_Üas | - Dual-band
- Hotspot
- WiFi Direct
- MU-MIMO
| |
bluetooth_version_Üstr | Bluetooth 5.1 | |
bluetooth_features_Üas | - A2DP
- AVRCP
- DIP
- HFP
- HID
- HSP
- BT LE
- MAP
- OPP
- PAN
- PBAP/PAB
| |
nfc_features_Üas | | |
port_type_Üss | USB Type C | Micro USB |
port_features_Üas | | |
Sim Card 0 |
---|
product_name_Üstr | Mi 10T | F3 |
unique_name_Üstr | SIM0 | SIM0 |
sim_type_Üss | Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
Sim Card 1 |
---|
product_name_Üstr | Mi 10T | F3 |
unique_name_Üstr | SIM0 | |
sim_type_Üss | Nano SIM/MicroSD | |
Multimedia |
---|
product_name_Üstr | Mi 10T | F3 |
multimedia_features_Üas | | |
audio_alerts_Üas | | |
audio_features_Üas | | - Loudspeaker
- 3.5mm Port
- FM Radio
|
audio_formats_Üas | | |
video_formats_Üas | | |
sensors_Üas | - Proximity
- Accelerometer
- Compass
- Gyroscope
- Barometer
- Fingerprint
- A-GPS
- BeiDou
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
| - Accelerometer
- Compass
- GPS
- A-GPS
- Gyroscope
- Proximity
|
Xiaomi Mi 10T vs. BenQ F3 Specs & Speed Benchmarks
battery_capacity_Ümah_Ünum
Higher is better