Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro : Specifications
Specifications Highlights |
---|
aggregated_product | Galaxy C9 Pro (Launched 2016-10-01), Price: 599 USD at Amazon |
aggregated_display | 6" 1920x1080 Super AMOLED |
aggregated_cam_rear_all | |
aggregated_cam_front_all | |
aggregated_computing | - MSM8976 Snapdragon 653 SoC
- 6GB RAM
- 64GB Storage
- MicroSD (256GB max.)
|
aggregated_battery | 4000 mAh |
aggregated_design | IP Rating, 189g (6.7oz), 162.9x80.7x6.9 mm (6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches) |
product_price_street_Üusd_Ünum | $599 |
Display |
---|
display_type_Üss | Super AMOLED |
display_diagonal_Üinch_Ünum | 6" |
display_body_ratio_Üpct_Ünum | 75.5% |
display_resolution_Üpix_Üstr | 1920x1080 |
display_density_Üppi_Ünum | 367 PPI |
display_glass_name_Üss | Gorilla Glass |
display_features_Üas | |
display_color_Übits_Ünum | 24 bit (16,777,216 colors) |
Primary Camera |
---|
megapixel_Ümpix_Ünum | 16-MP |
dyn_sensor_surface_descrption_Üstr | Small |
cam_hardware_features_Üas | |
video_resolutions_Üas | |
Battery |
---|
battery_capacity_Ümah_Ünum | 4000 mAh |
Computing |
---|
main_processor_brand_name_Üstr | Qualcomm |
main_processor_name_Üstr | MSM8976 Snapdragon 653 |
main_processor_ÜGhz_Üstr | 1.95 GHz |
memory_ram_ÜgB_Üanum | 6GB |
memory_built_in_storage_ÜgB_Üanum | 64GB |
memory_card_type_Üss | MicroSD |
memory_card_max_capacity_ÜgB_Ünum | 256GB |
operating_system_compound_Üstr | Android 6.0.1 |
Communications |
---|
lte_cat_down_Üstr | LTE CAT6 301 Mbps |
modem_features_Üas | |
wifi_speeds_Üas | |
wifi_features_Üas | - Hotspot
- Dual-band
- WiFi Direct
|
bluetooth_features_Üas | |
nfc_features_Üas | |
sar_eu_head_Üwpkg_Ünum | 0.79 W/Kg |
sar_eu_body_Üwpkg_Ünum | 1.62 W/Kg |
Sim Card 0 |
---|
unique_name_Üstr | SIM0 |
sim_type_Üss | Nano SIM |
Multimedia |
---|
audio_alerts_Üas | |
audio_speaker_channels_Üss | Stereo |
audio_features_Üas | |
video_formats_Üas | |
sensors_Üas | - Accelerometer
- Compass
- GPS
- A-GPS
- GLONASS
- Proximity
|
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro Specs & Speed Benchmarks
battery_capacity_Ümah_Ünum
Higher is better