Specifications Highlights |
---|
Product Name | 16s | Mi 9 |
Product | Meizu 16s (Launched 2019-04-01) | Xiaomi Mi 9 (Launched 2019-02-01), Price: 399 USD at Amazon |
Display | 6.22" 2232x1080 Super AMOLED | 6.39" 2340x1080 Super AMOLED |
Rear Camera(s) | - 48-MP f/1.7 (Primary) +OIS
- 20-MP f/2.6
| - 27mm 48-MP f/1.75 (Primary)
- 51mm 12-MP f/2.2
|
Selfie Camera(s) | | |
Computing | - Snapdragon 855 SoC
- 6GB/8GB RAM
- 128GB/256GB Storage
| - Snapdragon 855 SoC
- 6GB/8GB RAM
- 64GB/128GB Storage
|
Battery | 3600 mAh, mCharge | 3300 mAh, Wireless Charging, Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ |
Design | IP Rating, 165g (5.8oz), 73.4x151.9x7.6 mm (2.89 x 5.98 x 0.30 inches) | IP Rating, 173g (6.1oz), 74.67x157.5x7.61 mm (2.94 x 6.20 x 0.30 inches) |
Price (Market) | | $399 |
Price at Launch | | $599 |
Display |
---|
Product Name | 16s | Mi 9 |
Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Diagonal (inches) | 6.22" | 6.39" |
Display/Body Ratio | 87.8% | 85.2% |
Resolution | 2232x1080 | 2340x1080 |
Sharpness (PPI) | 399 PPI | 403 PPI |
Brightness (specs) | 800 NITs | 600 NITs |
Display Glass Type | | Gorilla Glass |
Features | - Multitouch
- Glossy
- 2.5D
- Always-On
| - Multitouch
- Glossy
- 2.5D
- Always-On
|
Color Depth | 24 bit (16,777,216 Colors) | 24 bit (16,777,216 Colors) |
Primary Camera |
---|
Product Name | 16s | Mi 9 |
Megapixel | 48-MP | 48-MP |
Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.75 |
Focal Length (35mm) | | 27mm |
Sensor Size | Enormous | Medium |
Autofocus Features | - Contrast
- Phase Detection
- Laser-Assisted
| - Contrast
- Phase Detection
- Laser-Assisted
|
Hardware Features | - LED Flash
- Autofocus
- OIS
- HDR Photo
| - Dual LED Flash
- LED Flash
- Autofocus
- HDR Photo
- Quad Bayer
|
Video Resolutions | | - 2160p/30fps
- 2160p/60fps
- 1080p/960fps
- 720p/960fps
|
Short-Zoom Camera |
---|
Product Name | | Mi 9 |
Megapixel | | 12-MP |
Aperture | | f/2.2 |
Focal Length (35mm) | | 51mm |
Sensor Size | | Very small |
Battery |
---|
Product Name | 16s | Mi 9 |
Battery Type | Li-Ion | Li-Poly |
Battery Capacity (mAh) | 3600 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Battery Features | | - Wireless Charging Integrated
- Fast Charge
- Non-Removable
|
Fast-Charge Protocol | mCharge | Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ |
Computing |
---|
Product Name | 16s | Mi 9 |
Processor Brand | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
Processor Name | Snapdragon 855 | Snapdragon 855 |
Processor # Cores | 8 | 8 |
Main Processor Frequency (GHz) | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
RAM Options | 6GB/8GB | 6GB/8GB |
Internal Storage Options | 128GB/256GB | 64GB/128GB |
Operating System + Version | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
Communications |
---|
Product Name | 16s | Mi 9 |
LTE Bands | 38, 39, 40, 41 | 12, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
Modem Features | - UMTS
- EDGE
- GPRS
- HSPA+
- LTE
- EV-DO A
- TD-SCDMA
- TD-HSDPA
| - UMTS
- EDGE
- GPRS
- HSPA+
- LTE
- EV-DO A
- TD-SCDMA
- TD-HSDPA
|
WiFi Speed | | |
WiFi Features | - Dual-band
- Hotspot
- WiFi Direct
| - Dual-band
- Hotspot
- WiFi Direct
|
Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
Bluetooth Features | | |
NFC Features | | |
Connector Type | USB Type C | USB Type C |
Connector Features | | |
SAR US Head | | 0.99 W/Kg |
SAR US Body | | 1.04 W/Kg |
SAR EU Head | | 1.389 W/Kg |
SAR EU Body | | 1.301 W/Kg |
Sim Card 0 |
---|
Product Name | 16s | Mi 9 |
Name | SIM0 | SIM0 |
SIM Type | Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
Sim Card 1 |
---|
Product Name | 16s | Mi 9 |
Name | SIM1 | SIM1 |
SIM Type | Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
Multimedia |
---|
Product Name | 16s | Mi 9 |
Multimedia Features | | |
Audio Features | | |
Audio Formats | - AAC
- 3GA
- AMR
- RA
- FLAC
- M4A
- MID
- MIDI
- MP3
- OGA
- OGG
- WMA
- WAV
| - AAC
- 3GA
- AMR
- RA
- AWB
- FLAC
- MID
- MIDI
- MP3
- OGA
- OGG
- WMA
- WAV
|
Video Formats | | - DIVX
- H.263
- H.264
- MPEG-4
- H.265
- MP4
- VC-1
- XVID
|
Sensors | - Proximity
- Accelerometer
- Compass
- Gyroscope
- Fingerprint
- GPS
- A-GPS
- GLONASS
- BeiDou
| - Proximity
- Accelerometer
- Compass
- Gyroscope
- Barometer
- Fingerprint
- A-GPS
- GPS
- GLONASS
- BeiDou
|
Meizu 16s vs. Xiaomi Mi 9 Specs & Speed Benchmarks
Basemark OS II 2.0
Higher is better
Battery Capacity (mAh)
Higher is better