To achieve an excellent ratio, Samsung has opted to use the LED TN display technology, which would be the equivalent to TFT LCD in Samsung’s line up. That’s in contrast to PLS technology, which is Samsung’s own version of IPS LCD. The main difference is a slightly narrower viewing angle of 170 (TN) degrees vs. 178(PLS), but when I looked at the monitor, and in the context of a desktop/office use, it think that it is a very small price to pay to massively save on the price.
Most other 4K monitors that you can purchase now, notably from Dell or ASUS are easily priced beyond $1000 (23.8”) or $2200 (31.5”). This is how good Samsung’s pricing gets. The competitors may offer slightly view angles, and depending on the models, maybe the color rendering would outperform this one. However, with a price that can shoot 3X or more above the Samsung UD890.
Like most 4K displays, the Samsung UD590 can reproduce 1.07 Billion colors, but I haven’t had an opportunity to run a color gamut test. As for response time, Samsung claims 1ms, which is to be compared with the 8ms or so of most 4K displays.
I think that most people would be pretty impressed with this particular monitor, and I would highly recommend it for office work (excel in 4K: priceless) or programmers because quadrupling the resolution of text does matter a lot in terms of comfort. Tablets and 4K laptops have pretty much proved so and I don’t think that there is much more convincing left to do. The brightness is 370 nit, which is plenty and can easily compete, or beat, other consumer-level 4K monitors on the market now.
Since the resolution is so high, it opens the door to many fun PIP (picture in picture) modes. The UD590 lets you create sub-regions at full resolution in case you want to keep an eye on something. Even 1080p would only occupy ¼ of the 4K screen. It is also possible to connect a second PC, and have both your PC, and the other one visible on screen at the same time. That could be useful if you administer a local server or something like that. I can’t imagine what people would do with it (split race with Forza 5, or collaborative TitanFall game maybe?)
The industrial design is very nice, and Samsung has kept it as simple and efficient as possible. The monitor stand uses a T-shape which is designed to occupy as little room as possible on the desk. This is a pretty smart design, but one that also puts some restrictions on how much you can adjust on the monitor: basically tilt forward/backward – that’s it.
Also, there is no VESA mount, so if you want to hang this on an ARM or a wall, it’s not going to happen. That’s a bummer, but I also understand that this is a high-volume product and most people don’t do that. A VESA mount also makes the frame thicker and requires more material on the frame, which makes the weight and price go up.
I have been waiting for 4K desktop monitors for a while, but the previous average price of $2000 to $3000 had a chilling factor. The Samsung UD590 blasts that price barrier away, and the other competitor worth of attention is the Dell Ultra 28, which seems almost equivalent, except that it has a VESA mount…