NVIDIA Maxwell GPU For GeForce Cards

NVIDIA has just announced that its next-generation of graphics processor (GPU) architecture codenamed Maxwell. This is in reference to James Clerk Maxwell, a scientist 19th century scientist known for his work on the electromagnetic field (he was the first person to unify optics, magnetism and electricity as being driven by the same phenomenon). NVIDIA has a tradition of naming its GPU architectures from famous scientists which goes all the way back to the NV04 chip which was codenamed Fahrenheit.

The Maxwell GPU design is manufactured on the same 28nm semiconductor process as the previous generation GPU: the NVIDIA Kepler (as seen in the GeForce GTX 680), so the performance improvements come from architectural changes and optimizations, but also from a slightly larger die-size area (148 vs. 118 square millimeters.

Looking at the comparison between the GK107 Kepler GPU and the GM107 Maxwell GPU, the latter has 66.6% more CUDA cores, the basic processing cores that churn all the computations. It’s L2 Cache size has also jumped from 256KB to 2048KB in a bid to reduce latency as much as possible.

GPU	GK107 (Kepler)	GM107 (Maxwell)
Cuda Cores	384	640
Base Clock (MHz)	1058	1020
Boost Clock (MHz)	N/A	1085
GFLOPs	812.5	1305.6
Texture Units	32	40
Texel fill-rate Gigatexel/sec)	33.9	40.8
Memory Clock (MHz)	5000	5400
Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec)	80	86.4
ROPs	16	16
L2 Cache Size	256KB	2048KB
TDP	64W	60W
Transistors (Billions)	1.3	1.87
Die Size square millimeters	118	148
Manufacturing Process (nm)	28	28

First products optimized for power-efficiency

Since Kepler, the GeForce GPU designs are used in Mobile to Desktop products, so there’s an inherent drive for power-efficiency that can be felt across NVIDIA’s entire line of chips. What the company has learned with GeForce provides a performance boost with Tegra mobile processors like the NVIDIA Tegra K1, while the lessons learned with Tegra will make future laptop and desktop processors that much more power-efficient."WHAT WAS ONCE A WIMPY PC CAN NOW BECOME A DECENT GAMING MACHINE"

The first products to hit the market are not your typical high-end super-fast graphics processors. On the contrary, the GeForce 750Ti and GeForce GTX 750 are in the mid-range, and they represent the the “meat” of NVIDIA’s market, and that is precisely where the company wants to attack first.

The second reason for that choice is that NVIDIA believes that it can easily outperform AMD on a performance-per-watt basis and address a market that was once out of reach for this level of performance: PCs that don’t have an additional 6-pin power connector – and this is pretty awesome. This means that what was once a wimpy PC can now become a decent gaming machine.

Architectural improvements driving higher performance

Interestingly enough, Desktop cards based on the Kepler architecture seemed already pretty efficient, and they themselves represented quite an upgrade from the previous NVIDIA Fermi architecture.

NVIDIA says that its Maxwell GPU delivers 35% higher performance per CUDA core, provided that math computations were limiting the speed and not other things like memory bandwidth, or workload). And since there are 66% more CUDA core in the new chip, you can see that the computation potential is much higher.

NVIDIA has not yet published a “deep-dive” white paper on Maxwell, but discussing this with their team, my understanding is that there were big changes in the way the workload was dispatched to CUDA Cores. In Kepler, each group of CUDA cores (called SM or streaming processor, a GPU can have 1 or many SM units) were sharing a register file and scheduler units. In the new design, NVIDIA made things more local, and has basically created some islands where smaller groups of CUDA cores have their own scheduler and register file. This probably leads to better locality, bandwidth, latency and it is better for the chip layout.

NVIDIA says that the new design does a better job of 1/ keeping all cores busy when needed 2/ powering the cores down when they are not needed. I’m just speculating, but it seems like this setup could give them much more granularity over which group of CUDA core gets shut down, which is probably not as easy with the Kepler design.

Faster H.264 video encoding

We all know that GPUs are really fast at graphics, and they can also be great for general-purpose computations, the speed at which they can compress video is often overlooked. If you compress video regularly, it is one of the rare things that still takes minutes or hours in one’s daily life, so any improvement is a big deal.

NVIDIA’s Maxwell architecture can compress video at 6X to 8X real-time speed, which means  that a one-hour video sequence could be compressed in 7.5 minutes (actual time depends on video quality etc…) which is quite impressive. Additionally, NVIDIA says that it can perform the video decode with a better power-efficiency because of architectural improvements done to that unit.

Video playback is a light workload, so the hard part here is to shut down as much of the chip as possible, while still being able to play the video and take care of the basic computer window environment. Maxwell has a low-power state called GC5 that helps it consume less power while playing video.

Performance-Per-Watt Pushed To The Next Level

While some of those details have been leaked last week, it is nice to finally see a clearer picture of what the NVIDIA Maxwell architecture is like and understand why it is more power-efficient. At the moment, NVIDIA is not launching new high-end gaming products, but it is clear that those will get a sizable boost when the time comes. For now, the mid-range gaming, low-power and silent PC enthusiast are probably mulling this new option since it allows them to have a much better gaming and video-encoding performance that stays within their own specifications. I have seen my fair share of GPUs, but the Maxwell architecture is impressive."THE MAXWELL ARCHITECTURE IS IMPRESSIVE."

The ability of running a powerful GPU that doesn’t require a 6-pin connector brings an amazing performance for this segment of the market. Think of it: is the performance that you could get four years ago for $500+ with the hottest (literally) and baddest NVIDIA GPU. Now, you can plug that in your small form factor (SFF) PC and it won’t even heat up the room.

Finally, it’s impossible not to think about what will happen when NVIDIA will integrate this into its next-gen Tegra mobile processor codenamed Parker that I will tentatively call Tegra M1…

 

Hubert Nguyen
Categories: Breaking, Computers
Tags: GPU (Graphics Processing Unit), NVIDIA