This allows a close monitoring of a patient, in a very non-invasive way. The information is gathered at the sensor level and transmitted to a cloud by a smartphone, or a small wireless “box” that runs on Verizon’s network (the sensor uses BT 4.0 to communicate). The Box has Bluetooth LE and other connectivity means, but it basically ensures that there is an internet connection over 3G when WiFi is not available. For deployments in medical facilities or as part of a medical kit, some elements have been already approved by the FDA, and even if a device is not approved, part of the network has been FDA-approved, so the overall production and deployment are easier from the developer’s perspective.
The patient is then able to share that data with a number of providers (or specialists) who will be able to data-mine to monitor or diagnose a condition.
Created by Kevin Fahrner, a bike enthusiast, Bike+ is a high-tech piece of equipment for bikes that merges anti-theft system (a rampant problem in San Francisco) and self-quantifying, since it measures distance and other metrics, thanks to its integrated GPS. The stand-alone prototype of the device looks rather innocuous as a bicycle bottle holder. But don’t let it fool you: it is in fact a system equipped with its own motion sensors, battery, GPS and a very noisy alarm.
At the moment, the stand-alone system needs to be recharged periodically, but Wi-MM told me that they were contemplating a version that was charged by the Bike+ motion – which would make sense, but I suppose that it is a secondary problem that can be easily solved once the main application is ready for production. Also, the company intends to pitch this to bike manufacturers for direct integration, so these details may fall on someone else’s laps.
When the bike is locked, any attempt to remove the system from the frame, or to move the bike will trigger an alarm (noisy!) and a possible emission of an SMS message to the owner. At the moment I’m not sure how sensitive it is, and what would happen if someone tripped on the bike by accident, but it’s probably something that its inventors will have to balance out. Car alarms work on the same principle, so there is surely a way to make this work with a low rate of false-positives.
The shoes work on the same principle, but since the sensor is in the sole, it is more about recording how much pressure is exerted in order to tweak performance, or warn the athlete that he/she needs to give their joints and articulations some rest before running more. This is the type of data that is not easily retrievable in general, but the benefit of having those in real-time is to allow immediate actions to be taken to prevent injury. That’s really where the “networked” aspect of these sensors come into play. Since each Athlete will have different characteristics, it’s virtually impossible to create some kind of “rule of thumb” that applies to everyone.