The Court of Appeals did agree with the International Trade Commission on Nintendo’s “not guilty” position, with the judge having described Motiva’s litigation as being “targeted at financial gains”. Nintendo of America’s deputy general counsel Richard Medway, said, “We are very pleased with this result. The court confirmed that Motiva’s sole activity, litigation against Nintendo, did not satisfy the ITC’s domestic industry requirement. Nintendo has a passionate tradition of developing innovative products while respecting the intellectual property rights of others. We vigorously defend patent lawsuits when we firmly believe that we have not infringed another party’s patent.” Still, this does not mean that Nintendo should rest on their laurels, as they do seem to have issues pushing the Wii U across the board at the moment.