That said, there are hurdles to overcome. For one, there is the network matter. Today, even if you have a 1080p camera, software like Skype often do the video compression with the CPU. Crunching 8 million pixels is no small feat, and even camera-embedded hardware-based solutions would have a hard time coping with this. We are talking about 185 megabits of data to compress every second.
For professional use, this could be another story. Given enough compute power and network bandwidth, this could work very well on a private network when used for something that requires the most minute details to be visible. Medicine and ultra-security come to mind, but the possibilities are endless. Still, I would love to see how it performs on Skype.